Sitemap

Building Your First RAG Pipeline with LangChain

4 min readJan 25, 2026

--

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is one of the most practical ways to build reliable AI systems today.

Instead of relying purely on a model’s internal knowledge, RAG lets you:

  • Inject your own data
  • Keep responses grounded
  • Reduce hallucinations
  • Build deterministic-ish AI systems

In this blog, we’ll build a simple end-to-end RAG pipeline:

  • Upload a document
  • Chunk it
  • Generate embeddings
  • Store in a vector database
  • Query it via a chat interface

🧠 What is RAG (Conceptually)?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) works in two phases:

  • Ingestion phase (offline)
    Document → Chunk → Embed → Store in vector DB
  • Retrieval phase (runtime)
    Query → Embed → Search → Retrieve → Generate response

This separation is important because it makes the system:

  • scalable
  • reusable
  • efficient

Instead of sending entire documents to the LLM every time, we only fetch the most relevant pieces, which keeps responses fast and cost-effective.

🚀 What We’re Building

A minimal system like this:

User uploads document → 
Text is chunked →
Embeddings generated →
Stored in Vector DB →

User asks question →
Relevant chunks retrieved →
LLM generates grounded answer

Tech Stack

  • LangChain → orchestration layer
  • FAISS → vector storage (local)
  • OpenAI embeddings + LLM (or any alternative)
  • Python

⚙️ Step 1: Install Dependencies

pip install langchain openai faiss-cpu tiktoken

📄 Step 2: Load and Read Document

Let’s assume a simple .txt file.

from langchain.document_loaders import TextLoader

loader = TextLoader("sample.txt")
documents = loader.load()

✂️ Step 3: Chunk the Document

What is Chunking and Why It Matters?

Chunking is simply breaking large documents into smaller pieces (chunks).

But this is not just preprocessing — it directly impacts answer quality.

Why?
- LLMs have context limits
-
Large documents cannot be processed at once
- Retrieval works better on focused, smaller units

Each chunk becomes:
- independently searchable
- individually embeddable
- easier to retrieve

Poor chunking leads to:
- irrelevant results
- incomplete answers
- hallucinations

A key insight:

  • Too large → noisy context
  • Too small → loss of meaning

Chunking is actually the foundation of your entire RAG pipeline, because everything downstream depends on it.

Why chunking matters:

  • LLMs have context limits
  • Smaller chunks improve retrieval precision
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter

text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
chunk_size=500,
chunk_overlap=50
)

docs = text_splitter.split_documents(documents)

Rule of thumb:

  • Smaller chunks → better precision
  • Larger chunks → better context

🔢 Step 4: Generate Embeddings

What are Embeddings?

Embeddings convert text into numbers — specifically, vectors.

Think of it like this:

"dog" → [0.12, -0.98, 0.44, ...]
"puppy" → [0.10, -0.95, 0.40, ...]

These vectors capture semantic meaning, not just keywords.

So:

  • “dog” and “puppy” → close in vector space
  • “dog” and “car” → far apart

This is what enables semantic search, instead of keyword matching.

In a RAG pipeline:

  • Each chunk → converted into an embedding
  • Query → also converted into an embedding
  • Similarity → used to find relevant content

Embeddings are the reason RAG feels “intelligent” rather than just “search-based.”

from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings

embeddings = OpenAIEmbeddings()

🧱 Step 5: Store in Vector DB

What is a Vector Database?

A vector database stores embeddings and allows similarity search.

Unlike traditional databases:
- SQL → exact match
- Vector DB → semantic similarity

When you store embeddings:
- Each chunk = one vector
- Stored along with metadata (source, page, etc.)

At query time:

  1. Convert query → embedding
  2. Search nearest vectors
  3. Return top-k similar chunks

This is usually done using approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) algorithms for speed.

That’s why vector DBs can:

  • search millions of chunks
  • return results in milliseconds

They are the retrieval engine of your RAG system.

We’ll use FAISS for simplicity.

from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS

vectorstore = FAISS.from_documents(docs, embeddings)

🔍 Step 6: Retrieval

How Retrieval Actually Works

Retrieval is where everything comes together.
- Query → embedding
- Compared with stored embeddings
- Top-K similar chunks selected

This “top-k” is critical:
- Low k → might miss context
- High k → introduces noise

The retrieved chunks are then:
- passed into the LLM
- used as context for answer generation

This step is what makes RAG:
- grounded
- context-aware
- reliable

Convert vector DB into a retriever:

retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 3})

This fetches top 3 relevant chunks.

💬 Step 7: Build the Chat Interface

Now we connect retrieval + LLM.

Why Not Just Use an LLM Directly?

Without RAG:
- LLM relies only on training data
- Can hallucinate
- Cannot access private data

With RAG:
- Answers are grounded in your data
- No retraining needed
- Easily updatable knowledge

This is why most real-world AI systems today use RAG instead of raw LLM calls.

from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI

llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4")

qa_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(
llm=llm,
retriever=retriever
)

🧪 Step 8: Ask Questions

query = "What is this document about?"
response = qa_chain.run(query)

print(response)

What’s Actually Happening

When you ask a question:

  1. Query → converted to embedding
  2. Vector DB → finds similar chunks
  3. Retrieved chunks → sent to LLM
  4. LLM → generates grounded answer

Common Mistakes (Important)

1. Treating RAG as “plug and play”

RAG quality depends heavily on:

  • Chunking strategy
  • Embedding model
  • Retrieval tuning

2. Ignoring chunk overlap

Without overlap:

  • Context breaks
  • Answers become incomplete

3. Not controlling retrieval size (k)

Too small → misses info
Too large → noisy context

4. No evaluation

Always test:

  • Correctness
  • Context relevance
  • Hallucination rate

Improvements You Can Add

  • Metadata filtering (source, page number)
  • Hybrid search (keyword + vector)
  • Better vector DB:
    - Pinecone
    - Weaviate
    - Qdrant
  • Streaming responses
  • Chat memory

Key Takeaways

  • RAG is not just retrieval + LLM
  • Quality comes from:
    - chunking
    - retrieval tuning
    - prompt design
  • Start simple → iterate based on evaluation

--

--

Sagar Sonwane
Sagar Sonwane

Written by Sagar Sonwane

Sr. Software Engineer @Josh Software Pvt. Ltd.